lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inter-individual variation promotes ecological success of populations and species: evidence from experimental and comparative studies
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. (Ctr Ecol & Evolut Microbial Model Syst EEMiS)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9598-7618
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0810-7390
2016 (English)In: Ecography, ISSN 0906-7590, E-ISSN 1600-0587, Vol. 39, no 7, p. 630-648Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Biological diversity is threatened by exploitation, fragmentation of natural habitats, pollution, climatechange, and anthropogenic spread of species. The question of how among-individual variation influencesthe performance of populations and species is a poorly explored but currently growing field of research.Here, we review 31 experimental and 14 comparative studies and first investigate whether there is empiricalsupport for the propositions that higher levels of among-individual phenotypic and genetic variationpromote the ecological and evolutionary success of populations and species in the face of environmentalchange. Next, we examine whether and how the effect of diversity depends on environmental conditions.Finally, we explore whether the relationship linking population fitness to diversity is typically linear,asymptotic, or whether the benefits peak at intermediate diversity. The reviewed studies provide strong,almost invariable, evidence that more variable populations are less vulnerable to environmental changes,show decreased fluctuations in population size, have superior establishment success, larger distributionranges, and are less extinction prone, compared with less variable populations or species. Given theoverwhelming evidence that variation promotes population performance, it is important to identifyconditions when increased variation does not have the theoretically expected effect, a question ofconsiderable importance in biodiversity management, where there are many other practical constraints. Wefind that experimental outcomes generally support the notion that genetic and phenotypic variation is ofgreater importance under more stressful than under benign conditions. Finally, population performanceincreased linearly with increasing diversity in the majority (10 of 12) of manipulation studies that includedfour or more diversity levels; only two experiments detected curvilinear relationships.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 39, no 7, p. 630-648
National Category
Evolutionary Biology Ecology
Research subject
Ecology, Evolutionary Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-45647DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01357ISI: 000379904700003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84945143735OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-45647DiVA, id: diva2:844944
Available from: 2015-08-10 Created: 2015-08-10 Last updated: 2021-05-05Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Population-level consequences of variation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Population-level consequences of variation
2012 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Consequences of within population variation have recently attracted an increased interest in evolutionary ecology research. Theoretical models suggest important population-level consequences, but many of these predictions still remain to be tested. These issues are important for a deepened understanding of population performances and persistence, especially in a world characterized by rapid fragmentation of natural habitats and other environmental changes.

I review theoretical models of consequences from intra population genetic and phenotypic variation. I find that more variable populations are predicted to be characterized by broader resource use, reduced intraspecific competition, reduced vulnerability to environmental changes, more stable population dynamics, higher invasive potential, enhanced colonization and establishment success, larger distribution ranges, higher evolvability, higher productivity, faster population growth rate, decreased extinction risk, and higher speciation rate, compared with less variable populations.

To test some of these predictions I performed experiments and compared how different degree of colour polymorphism influences predation risk and establishment success in small groups. My comparisons of predation risk in mono- and polymorphic artificial prey populations showed that the risk of being eaten by birds does not only depend on the coloration of the individual prey item itself, but also on the coloration of the other members of the group. Two experiments on establishment success in small founder groups of

Tetrix subulata pygmy grasshoppers with different degree of colour morph diversity show that establishment success increases with higher degree of diversity, both under controlled conditions in outdoor enclosures and in the wild. These findings may be important for re-stocking of declining populations or re-introductions of locally extinct populations in conservation biology projects.

I report on remarkably rapid evolutionary shifts in colour morph frequencies in response to the changed environmental conditions in replicated natural populations of pygmy grasshoppers in fire ravaged areas. This finding

1

illustrates the high adaptive potential in a polymorphic species, and indicates the importance of preserved within-species diversity for evolutionary rescue.

Finally, I review if theoretical predictions are supported by other published empirical tests and find strong support for the predictions that more variable groups benefit from reduced vulnerability to environmental changes, reduced population fluctuations and extinction risk, larger distribution ranges, and higher colonization or establishment success.

In conclusion, my thesis illustrates how within-population variation influences ecological and evolutionary performances of populations both in the short and long term. As such, it emphasizes the need for conservation of biodiversity also within populations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kalmar: Linnaeus University Press, 2012. p. 53
Series
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 105
Keywords
colour polymorphism, diversity, establishment success, evolutionary changes, population-level consequences, predation risk, Tetrix subulata, variation
National Category
Evolutionary Biology
Research subject
Ecology, Evolutionary Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-32522 (URN)9789186983901 (ISBN)
Public defence
2012-12-14, Fullriggaren, Linnéuniversitetet, Landgången 4, Kalmar, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2014-03-27 Created: 2014-02-27 Last updated: 2022-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Forsman, AndersWennersten, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsman, AndersWennersten, Lena
By organisation
Department of Biology and Environmental Science
In the same journal
Ecography
Evolutionary BiologyEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 253 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf