lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Dept Serv Management & Serv Studies,Sweden ; Univ Queensland, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0505-9207
Univ Queensland, Australia ; Natl Inst Ecol, South Korea.
2015 (English)In: Ecological Economics, ISSN 0921-8009, E-ISSN 1873-6106, Vol. 113, 106-113 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In many cities of the world, bicycle infrastructure projects are implemented to foster more sustainable transportation systems. However, such projects have often raised questions regarding their public funding, as they entail considerable costs. This paper reviews cost-benefit analysis (CBA) frameworks as these are presently used to assess bicycle infrastructure projects. Specific focus is on the CBA framework developed in Copenhagen, Denmark, a self-declared "city of cyclists". In this framework, costs and benefits of car and bicycle, the two major urban transport modes, have been assessed and are compared across accidents, climate change, health, and travel time. The analysis reveals that each km travelled by car or bike incurs a cost to society, though the cost of car driving is more than six times higher (Euro 0.50/km) than cycling (Euro 0.08/km). Moreover, while the cost of car driving is likely to increase in the future, the cost of cycling appears to be declining. The paper concludes with a discussion of the applicability of the Copenhagen CBA framework to advance sustainable transport planning and to motivate and justify urban restructuring. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 113, 106-113 p.
Keyword [en]
Bicycles, Cars, Copenhagen, Cost-benefit analysis, Sustainable transport, Urban transport transition
National Category
Environmental Sciences Economics and Business
Research subject
Tourism
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-45998DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.006ISI: 000353096900010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-45998DiVA: diva2:850352
Available from: 2015-09-01 Created: 2015-09-01 Last updated: 2017-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gössling, Stefan
By organisation
Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship
In the same journal
Ecological Economics
Environmental SciencesEconomics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 179 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf