lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison oF Different Tests for Evaluation of the Meibomian Glands
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry.
2015 (English)In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, ISSN 0146-0404, E-ISSN 1552-5783, Vol. 56, no 7Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Other academic) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 56, no 7
National Category
Ophthalmology
Research subject
Natural Science, Optometry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-47384ISI: 000362891103257OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-47384DiVA, id: diva2:873545
Conference
Annual Meeting of the Association-for-Research-in-Vision-and-Ophthalmology (ARVO), MAY 03-07, 2015, Denver, CO
Available from: 2015-11-24 Created: 2015-11-24 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Gierow, PeterBoström, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gierow, PeterBoström, Johanna
By organisation
Department of Medicine and Optometry
In the same journal
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 271 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf