lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Attitudes and language shaping the SSI discussion
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences. (Networ for Science Education Research & Development)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9132-8615
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4221-3464
2015 (English)In: ESERA 2015, The 11th Biannual Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA): Science Education Research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future., 2015Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The use of Socio-scientific Issues (SSI) in science education aiming at fostering critical thinking and decision-making capacities is known to develop the quality of students’ socio-scientific arguments. Teachers scaffolding has been shown to be important for the quality of students’ reasoning. Although students’ untutored socio-scientific discussions are recognized as important for reasoning quality, little is known about these interactions among peers. Such information is crucial for further development of teachers’ scaffolding. The aim of this study is to explore the underpinnings of student discussions on SSI in order to develop understanding for key aspects with importance for the faith of students’ decision-making conversation. Data were transcribed discussions from 4 groups of Swedish high-school students discussing “Wolves in Sweden and biodiversity”. Our theoretical framework builds on Dewey’s notion of Open-mindedness and Bernstein’s communication codes. Students’ inputs interrupting or re-vitalizing conversations were coded as Open-minded/Close-minded (OM/CM) and Elaborated/Restricted code (Ec/Rc) and their functions interpreted. In some utterances (Morals and Agitational talk) the use of Ec were found to interrupt or narrow the conversation. CM utterances (Morals and Opinions) typically interrupted conversation, something that has to be counteracted by teachers by encouraging students’ Open-mindedness in order to promote a multifaceted informal socio-scientific discussion.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Pedagogics and Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-48246OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-48246DiVA: diva2:877777
Conference
ESERA 2015, The 11th Biannual Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Helsinki, August 31 - September 4, 2015.
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2015-12-07 Created: 2015-12-07 Last updated: 2017-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Conference book

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, MatsFolkesson, Anne-Mari
By organisation
Department of Chemistry and Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 135 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf