lnu.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 55
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    A year at the Opera: social innovation in between organizing contexts and idealistic infrastructures2018In: Presented at Neon-konferansen 2018: Innovasjon i organisasjoner – utfordringer og muligheter, Høgskolen i innlandet (HINN), Lillehammer, Norway, November 21-22, 2018, 2018Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In the early fall of 2013 it is reported in Smålandsposten, the local newspaper in the Småland region in the southern part of Sweden, that an opera house recently has been founded, and that it will stage Mozart’s The Magic Flute the following summer. To accentuate the regional connection the name of the opera house is Smålandsoperan, and behind the initiative are two cultural entrepreneurs who are presented as being driven by “bringing opera to the people” on one hand, and establishing a cultural institution that could house all the region’s opera competences and interests on the other. “One should not have to go to the big cities to experience opera”, one of them is quoted, highlighting the democratic aspects of both cultural production and consumption.

    One year later Smålandsoperan is considered to be a huge success; the shows have been sold-out, the opera house has been taken to the heart by the critics. And the success has continued: In 2018 the opera has firmly established itself as an actor to be relied upon with five consecutive years of sold-out shows and critically acclaimed reviews. The success has however not come easy. Run as a corporate business, the opera has not been eligible for receiving financial support from public authorities, thus being solely dependent on revenues. This has put pressure on Smålandsoperan’s board to balance the company’s artistic ambitions with harsh economic realities – and doing so in an innovative manner.

    In this paper, based on empirical field work carried out at Smålandsoperan under its first year (the thick description is reported in Ericsson, 2018), the board’s innovative actions during the opera’s first year is interpreted and problematized from an institutional logic’s perspective; and it is shown how different innovations are construed by means of the mobilization of two interrelated resources. On one hand the innovations are construed in relation to an organizing context, an all-encompassing and situated form of life where people not only live very closely with each other but also have developed a shared perception of the world (Johannisson, 2005), constituted by a loosely coupled network of cultural entrepreneurs “at the margins” (cf. Scott, 2012) of the artistic field who most often are related to each other by kinship and/or friendship. On the other hand the innovations are construed in relation to an idealistic infrastructure made up of non-profit associations and movements that are knitted together by the sharing of artistic ideals and values (cf. Ericsson, 2018).

  • 2.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Allegori över en författare i kreativ kris?2015In: Pär Lagerkvist i text och ton / [ed] Magnus Eriksson & Margareta Petersson, Växjö: Pär Lagerkvist-samfundet , 2015, 1, p. 11-20Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Pär Lagerkvists Hissen som gick ned i helvete från 1924 tolkas utifrån sin bibliska intertext som en kritisk allegori över ett modernistiskt och sekulariserat samhälle, ett samhälle där moralens gränser luckrats upp så till den grad att ”eviga” värden ställs på huvudet och överskrids utan några som helst skrupler eller konsekvenser; och förstås därigenom som en allegori över sin egen förmedling och tillblivelse, som en skildring av den gränsöverskridande Konstnärens predikament i en krasst ekonomiserad värld. 

  • 3.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    An essay on the entrepreneurial war machine2018In: Innovation, management, entrepreneurship and sustainability: proceedings of the 6th international conference, May 31 – June 1, 2018, Prague / [ed] Ondřej Dvouletý, Martin Lukeš & Jan Mísař, Prague: Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Nakladatelství Oeconomica , 2018, p. 257-265Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose: The purpose is to present and explore Deleuze and Guattari’s (1988) concept of the “war machine” in relation to the academic discourse on entrepreneurship in order to contribute with a nuanced understanding of the discourse’s centrality in contemporary societies as well as its consequences.

    Design/methodology/approach: The paper is conceptual in character and written in the form of an essay in order to capitalize upon the essay’s tentative and reflective epistemology.

    Findings: The academic discourse on entrepreneurship conceptualized as a war machine is found to be set up against the State apparatus and resisting State appropriation by 1) deprecating bureaucracy, 2) criticizing normative societal institutions, and 3) self-consciously mobilizing actors into a scholarly movement. The consequences of these forms of resistance are on one hand a discursive colonialization of the natural, and on the other hand the formation of a seemingly strong alloy between the academic discourse on entrepreneurship and neoliberal ideology/political agendas.

    Research/practical implications: The academic discourse on entrepreneurship conceptualized as a war machine draws attention to the discourse’s taken-for-granted notions about entrepreneurship as well as their consequences. As such the conceptualisation opens up for critical research on otherwise neglected or silenced empirical topics within research on entrepreneurship such as the formation of the academic discourse on entrepreneurship, the enrolment, socialisation, subjection and subjectification of researchers on entrepreneurship, and the discursive tactics of entrepreneurship researchers’ visavi the State apparatus.

    Originality/value: In line with the essayistic epistemology, the essay hopefully gives the reader the opportunity to reflect upon on neglected or silenced issues within the academic discourse on entrepreneurship.

  • 4.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    An other creative city: social innovation in Malmö2013In: Presented at the 31st Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism, Warsaw, Poland, July 13-16, 2013, 2013Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 5.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Another Other?: The Luddites of the Digitial Revolution2008In: ACSCOS 2008 – The 3rd Australasian Caucus of the Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism, University of Technology, Sydney, 26-28 november., University of Technology, Sydney , 2008Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 6.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Business, Economics and Design, Linnaeus School of Business and Economics.
    Book review. Cinzia Dal Zotto and Hans van Kranenburg, Editors, Management and innovation in the media industry, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2008) ISBN 978 1 84720 1092010In: Scandinavian Journal of Management, ISSN 0956-5221, E-ISSN 1873-3387, Vol. 26, no 1, p. 97-98Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Chefen: En (av)sedd och o(av)sedd symbol2007In: LOOP - Tidskriften om Ledarskap Organisation och Personal, ISSN 1653-073X, Vol. 3, no 3, p. 54-56Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Business, Economics and Design, Linnaeus School of Business and Economics.
    Constellations of Another Other: The Case of Aquarian Nation2010In: (De)mobilising the Entrepreneurship Discourse: Exploring Entrepreneurial Thinking and Action / [ed] Bill, Frederic, Bjerke, Björn and Johansson, Anders W., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010, 1, p. 179-200Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Constructing time in organizational change processes: a dutiful managerial interest2017In: Presented at the 10th International Critical Management Studies Conference, Liverpool, UK, July 3-5, 2017, 2017Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Business, Economics and Design, Linnaeus School of Business and Economics.
    David Silverman - Struggling with the Theory of Organisation2011In: On the Shoulders of Giants / [ed] Jensen, Tommy & Wilson, Timothy L., Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2011, 1, p. 251-266Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    De (o)säkrade organisationerna2006In: Den oavsedda organisationen, 2006, p. 85-107Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 12.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Dead or alive and kicking?2019In: Presented at Musik och Samhälle 2019: Tema "LIVE", Lund, Sweden, October 10, 2019, 2019Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    För snart tio år sedan skrev jag en bok med den något pretentiösa titeln “Den odöda musiken: Essäer om teknologi, ledarskap och kreativitet”. Min utgångspunkt var att musikens fält inte längre var vad det en gång varit, och att många – i perspektiv av digitalisering och nya alternativa produktions-, konsumtions- och distributionskrafter – proklamerat musikindustrins död. Argumentet jag förde fram var att musikindustrin inte alls var död, men att den å andra sidan inte var levande på det vis den tidigare varit. Musikindustrin befann sig istället i ett slags kreativt limbo, hävdade jag, i väntan på ledarskap.

    Frågan jag nu ställer mig: Hur blev det då? Hur står det till med de ”kreativa binära maskinerier” jag menade kännetecknade det odöda tillståndet? Och vad hände med ”det kreativa självets teknologier” och ”det otänktas medieapparater”?

  • 13.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Den oavsedda organisationen2006Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Den Grundläggande Organisationsteorin utgör i mångt och mycket ett slags självspelande piano: Blickarna riktas per automatik mot myndighetssfärerna och de större internationella industri- och tjänsteföretagen. De perspektiv som an-läggs är få till antalet och mer eller mindre självskrivna. Och de problemområ-den som fokuseras är rätt så förutsägbara – och därmed också rätt så ointressan-ta. Som en konsekvens av detta tenderar den komplexa och mångfacetterade verkligheten att reduceras till ett mycket litet antal organisatoriska slagdängor – refränger som vi i, och genom, monotona upprepningar förleds tro utgöra verk-ligheten istället för att enbart vara aspekter av densamma. Organisationer har så strukturer, organisationer har kultur, chefer har makt – och det samtidigt som allt det som faller utanför den Grundläggande Organisationsteorins repertoar blir till något icke-existerande, och något o(av)sett.

    I denna antologi antyds konturerna av hur en o(av)sedd organisationsteori skulle kunna se ut. Uppmärksamheten riktas mot oavsedda empiriska organisa-tioner som friskola, landsting och ståndssamhället. Oavsedda förlorade organi-satoriska betydelser och organiserade maktspel perspektiveras; och spöklikt kusliga frågeställningar reses.

    Tillsammans visar de olika bidragen på behovet av att ”tänka om” inom det organisationsteoretiska fältet; ”tänka om” såväl i imperativets mening –”tänk om!” – som i den spekulativa spekulationens betydelse – ”tänk om det är på det här viset…?”

    Bokens redaktör, Daniel Ericsson, är verksam som forskare på Ekonomihögsko-lan, Växjö Universitet.

  • 14.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Business, Economics and Design, Linnaeus School of Business and Economics.
    Den odöda musiken2010Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Musikens fält är inte vad det en gång var. Den starka position musikindustrin tidigare hade på fältet är på väg att intas av alternativa och gränsöverskridande produktions- och konsumtionskrafter; digitaliseringen har lett till en i grunden förändrad tidsgeografi vad gäller hur musik konsumeras och produceras; och distributörer och producenter av musik har förenats i en gemensam kamp mot fildelare och pirater. Det vi bevittnar, påstår vissa kritiker, är de sista dödsryckningarna av en teknikfientlig och reaktionär musikindustri.

    I Den odöda musiken förs argumentet fram att musikindustrin inte alls är döende, men att den kanske inte heller är levande på det sätt som den tidigare varit. Aktörerna på fältet befinner sig snarare i ett slags kreativitetens limbo, ett tillstånd i väntan på något som skulle kunna kallas ”ledarskap”.

    I nio essäer skisseras konturerna av detta tillstånd och hur det kan förstås som ett musikpolitiskt paradigmskifte i perspektiv av kreativitetens binära maskinerier, det kreativa självets teknologier och det otänktas medieapparater.

     

  • 15.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Den pretentiösa vetenskapen2003In: Det oavsedda ledarskapet / [ed] Daniel Ericsson, Lund: Academia adacta, 2003, 1, p. 17-32Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 16.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Det gamla och det glömda2003In: Det oavsedda ledarskapet / [ed] Daniel Ericsson, Lund: Academia adacta, 2003, 1, p. 71-80Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 17.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Det oavsedda entreprenörskapet2004Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Under det senaste decenniet har entreprenörskapsforskningen konsoliderats till att bli ett självständigt forskningsfält. Ett stort antal professurer i entreprenörskap har inrättats, forskningsanslagen ökar, speciella entreprenörskapsutbildningar och forskarnätverk bildas och alltfler avhandlingar produceras i ämnet.

    I många avseenden går denna akademiska utveckling hand i hand med samhällets socioekonomiska skeenden, från krisåren i början av det förra decenniet via haussen inom ramen för den nya ekonomin ett par år senare till det nya millenniets gryende förhoppningar om ett mer sansat och hälsosammare arbetsliv. Vi ser en ”ny” typ av ideologi växa fram i arbetslivet, en entreprenörskapsideologi, som en bit in på 2000-talet verkar fortsätta att tillta i såväl styrka som räckvidd.

    I ljuset av denna ideologi kan det vara på sin plats att reflektera kring entreprenörskapets fältmässiga och ideologiska möjlighetsbetingelser. Där andra talar om entreprenören som en frihetslängtande småföretagare med ambitioner att växa, framskrivs i Det oavsedda entreprenörskapet det osedda och oavsedda inom entreprenörskapsideologin – entreprenörskapspositioner och dispositioner som etablissemanget, i vid bemärkelse, av en eller annan anledning inte (av)ser och därför inte uttalar sig om. Ur skuggorna frigör sig entreprenörskapets brödföretagare och orientaler; de frånvarande, de tafatta, och de särskilt nyttiga entreprenörerna; samt de lekfulla entreprenörskapsfetischisterna och Don Quijote. 

  • 18.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Det o(av)sedda ledarskapet2003In: Det oavsedda ledarskapet / [ed] Daniel Ericsson, Lund: Academia adacta, 2003, p. 7-16Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 19.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Det oavsedda ledarskapet2003Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Ledarskap tar sig en mängd olika uttryck varav många faller utanför den traditionella ledarskapsforskningens blickfång. Ledarskap utövas på osedda arenor och av misskända aktörer, och det utövas ofta utan att det föreligger någon djupare medvetenhet därom. I mångt och mycket är därför ledarskap o(av)sett, på en och samma gång både osett och oavsett.

    Det som företas i denna skrift kan ses som ett försök att åstadkomma ett trendbrott. Det är ett försök att inskärpa medvetenheten om ledarskapets sociala konstruktion, och det är ett försök att lämna den avsedda aspektblindheten till förmån för ett oavsett aspektseende, ett seende som utmanar etablerade och rådande (syn)intryck och uttrycksformer.

    Där andra framhäver modernistiska dygder som utbildning, självutvärderingar, humanism, tidsoptimism, framgång och frihet, framträder i Det oavsedda ledarskapetodygdigheter som inbillning, meningslöshet, förolämpningar, tidsnöd, tråkighet och inskränkthet. Och där andra låter Benjamin Franklins ande sväva över ledarskapets praktiker, frambesvärjs postmodernitetens ledarskapsspöken i form av Ned Ludd, Carl von Linné och Niccolò Machiavelli. 

  • 20.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Entrepreneurship at the opera: in between business, art, ideals, and "gemeinschaft"2017In: Presented at Neon-konferansen 2017: Omstillingsprosesser, Nord University, Bodø, November 21-23, 2017, 2017Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 21.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Entreprenörskapsfetischism: Noter om entreifiering och entrepomorfisering2004In: Det oavsedda entreprenörskapet, Academia Adacta, Lund , 2004, p. 85-107Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Entreprenörskapsfältet: O(av)sedda positioner och dispositioner2004In: Det oavsedda entreprenörskapet, Academia Adacta, Lund , 2004, p. 7-13Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    Förändringsprocesser i stora organisationer2016 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Genusskriptens omvandlingar på musikens fält2008In: Rock och samhälle, Hultsfred, 11-13 juni, 2008Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 25.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    “I don’t want to be alternative”: The Case of Aquarian Nation2008In: the Annual Conference of IASPM-ANZ, International Association for the Study of Popular Music, Australia-New Zealand branch, 28-30 november, Griffith University, Brisbane, Griffith University, Brisbane , 2008Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 26.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    In between Odysseus’ scar and Abraham’s sacrifice: narrative styles shaping the field of social entrepreneurship and social innovation2013In: Presented at the 5th International Conference on Rhetoric and Narratives in Management Research, ESADE - Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain, March 25-27, 2013, 2013Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 27.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Business, Economics and Design, Linnaeus School of Business and Economics.
    Kreativa konstellationer på musikens fält: På väg mot en utökad institutionell organisationsrepertoar2012In: Intro - En antologi om Musik och Samhälle / [ed] Johan A. Lundin, Malmö: Kira förlag , 2012, 1, p. 204-221Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 28.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Stockholm School of Economics.
    Kreativa ledare?1999In: Osynlig företagsledning / [ed] Sven-Erik Sjöstrand, Jörgen Sandberg & Mats Tyrstrup, Stockholm: Studentlitteratur AB, 1999, 1, p. 195-220Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    Like a bridge over troubled water?: prosumption in the field of music2013In: Presented at the 29th EGOS Colloquium: “Bridging Continents, Cultures and Worldviews”, Montréal, July 4–6, 2013, 2013Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 30.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Musik och samhälle: Två sidor av samma mynt: Hur västvärlden fylldes med musik. Människorna. Organisationerna. Musikens kedjor av Lars Östman, Kulturhistoriska bokförlaget, 2018 och Musikens makt. RJ:s årsbok 2018 av Jenny Björkman och Arne Jarrick (red), Makadams förlag, 20182019In: Organisation & Samhälle, ISSN 2001-9114, E-ISSN 2002-0287, no 2, p. 27-28Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 31.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Musikmysteriet: Organiserade stämningar och motstämningar2007Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Som musiker, sångare och låtskrivare har Francis Dunnery legat på topplistorna med It Bites, Lauryn Hill och Santana. Han har turnerat världen runt med artister som Asia och Robert Plant, är en aktad producent åt Ian Brown och Chris Difford, och ger ut såväl egen som andras musik på det oberoende skivbolaget Aquarian Nations. I samklang med sin musikaliska karriär studerar han jungiansk psykologi, är värd för en egen radiostation, och ägnar sig åt astrologi och välgörenhet.

    Men vem är han? Var kommer han ifrån? Vad vill han? Vart är han på väg? Och hur kan det komma sig att han, som är i det närmaste okänd för den breda allmänheten, har en hängiven skara fans, spridd över hela världen, som följer nästan varje steg han tar?

    Med utgångspunkt i Theodor Adornos ideologikritiska kultursociologi sätts Francis Dunnerys karriär i perspektiv av (mass)kulturens bedrägliga konsekvenser för den kreativa människan, i stort och i smått. Kreativitetens musikaliska spelstrategier identifieras och ifrågasätts, musikindustrins mansmytiska (o)frihetsgrader friläggs och rockens filosofiska refränger sätts på pränt – för att tillsammans bilda en kontrapunktisk allegori över det kreativa fältets organiserade stämningar och motstämningar.

  • 32.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
    Myter om metod2019 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    En rad olika idéer om vad forskning är och hur forskning bör bedrivas florerar på universitet och högskolor. En del av dessa idéer känns så självklara att de inte ens behöver diskuteras. På så sätt utgör de myter – inte för att de är falska, så som begreppet myt ibland används i vardagligt tal, utan för att de rymmer samma slags osynliga förklaringskraft och styrka som återfinns inom religionens och sagans världar. Idéerna skänker studenter, lärare och forskare mål och mening. Men vid närmare granskning ter de sig inte alls så självklara.

    I den här boken beskrivs åtta betydelsefulla myter som präglar akademiskt liv, och för varje myt formuleras ett alternativt sätt att se på akademiskt arbete. Författaren lyfter därmed fram den metodmångfald som råder inom lärosätenas väggar, och utmanar samtidigt många förgivettagna sanningar till förmån för en mer differentierad, lyhörd och reflekterande forskningspraktik.

  • 33.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Organisationsteorier i ögonvrån2006In: Den oavsedda organisationen, Academia Adacta, Lund , 2006, p. 7-20Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 34.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Power, knowledge and domination2008In: Scandinavian Journal of Management, ISSN 0956-5221, E-ISSN 1873-3387, Vol. 24, no 2, p. 162-163Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Professorn har ordet2007In: Den lekande farbrorn: Vänbok med anledning av Bengt Johannisson 65 år, Studier i Entreprenörskap, Växjö Universitet, Växjö , 2007, p. 71-88Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    (Re)konfigurerad fallogocentrism på musikens fält2009In: En bok om genus : Nyfikenhet, nytänkande och nytta / [ed] Schömer, Eva och Angelfors, Christina, Växjö: Växjö University Press , 2009, 1, p. 81-101Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 37.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Business, Economics and Design, Linnaeus School of Business and Economics.
    Scripting Creativity2010 (ed. 1)Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    In the field of music, discourse on creativity has predominantly centred on issues such as digitalization, piracy, copyright law, and the business dilemmas and challenges facing the major actors in the industry. What creativity is or could be is, however, seldom questioned: it is either taken for granted or seen as standing in stark opposition to the strategies of the majors trying to defend their positions in the field.

    This book contributes to the discourse on creativity by deconstructing a volume of the leading music journal in Scandinavia, Musikermagasinet, from a social constructionist perspective. It does this by asking what field (dis)positions are being mediated by the journal, and how this is accomplished.

    Creativity, it is proposed, can be seen as scripted in the field of music, and the journal as a gender scripting machine that inscribes – and exscribes – creative (dis)positions into the field in hegemonic and binary ways.

  • 38.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Social entrepreneurship: between Odysseus’s scar and Abraham’s sacrifice2016In: Social entrepreneurship and social enterprises: Nordic perspectives / [ed] Linda Lundgaard Andersen, Malin Gawell & Roger Spear, New York and London: Routledge, 2016, 1, p. 141-157Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In the City of Malmö, social entrepreneurship initiatives are being proposed to reduce health inequalities among citizens. How do these initiatives acquire legitimacy? Taking a narrative turn, I suggest that social entrepreneurship in theory and practice is shaped by the narrative styles of Homer and the Old Testament, and that building the legitimacy of social entrepreneurship apparently entails not only aligning biased interests with neoliberal and managerial discourses but also narrating the reality of social entrepreneurship by means of enchanting digressions and tacit truth claims. However, such acquired legitimacy comes at a cost, giving rise to specific consequences for social entrepreneurship in general and for the City of Malmö specifically.

  • 39.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Social innovations in the cultural field: an essay2019In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference: Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: May 30 – 31, 2019, Prague / [ed] Ondřej Dvouletý, Martin Lukeš & Jan Mísař, Prague: University of Economics, Prague, Oeconomica Publishing House , 2019, p. 183-194Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose: This study seeks to shed light on how social innovations are constructed in the cultural field by probing the phenomenon in relation to the enactment of an opera company in the Småland region in southern Sweden.

    Design/methodology/approach: The study is based on an ethnographically inspired study, and is written in the form of an essay to capitalize on the genre’s tentative and reflective epistemology.

    Findings: The study illustrates how a specific social innovation in the cultural field is both a product and producer of social innovations, and how social innovation processes could be understood as assemblages of social innovations enacted using organizing contexts and idealistic infrastructures. In opposition to the idea that social innovations are solutions to social problems, it is proposed that solutions to social problems might represent the unintended consequence of deploying various social innovations. It is also suggested that social innovation processes in the cultural field is non-linear and irrational in character.

    Research/practical implications: The discourse on social innovation is largely based on a calculative engineering logic. This logic stands in sharp contrast to creative and artistic logics, and could hamper social innovation initiatives in the cultural sector. There is therefore a need for a differentiated understanding of social innovation in both theory and practice – an understanding that acknowledges social innovation as a construction dependent on specific contexts, processes, and people.

    Originality/value: The essay allows the reader to reflect on how social innovations are constructed in different contexts. 

  • 40.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Sociala innovationer på musikens fält: från lurig oxymoron till tongivande innovationspolitik2014In: Coda: andra antologin om Musik och samhälle / [ed] Mikael Askander, Johan A. Lundin & Johan Söderman, Malmö: Kira förlag , 2014, 1, p. 143-151Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Musiklivet är en blind fläck på den sociala innovationskartan. Varför är det så? Utifrån en diskussion om den sociala innovations-diskursens för-givet-taganden öppnas samtalet upp för en tongivande, istället för en tondöv, innovationspolitik. 

  • 41.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    The Hedged CEO: A linguistic deconstruction of Letters to Shareholders2007In: European Accounting Association, 25-27 April: 30th Annual Congress: Programme and Abstracts, EAA, Lissabon , 2007Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The discursive practices of managerial leadership are crucial for understanding contemporary economic and social life. Managerial leaders not only hold prominent positions in society from which economic and human resources are (re)distributed, but are also, as belonging to a specific cultural category, given rights of interpretation as regards political and social issues.

    In this paper CEOs’ letters to the shareholders (LtS) in Annual Reports are approached as an important feature of this discursive practice. LtS, it is argued, provide information about the company’s past, current state and future, but also allow managers to interpret, announce, rationalize and legitimate their decisions, actions and results. As such, LtS contribute to the construction of managerial leadership and to the (re)establishment of categorical entitlements.

    In the paper LtS are approached from a hedging perspective. The concept of hedging is used within linguistics to circumscribe the words and expressions in our vocabularies, e.g. “I believe”, “maybe” and “it seems”, whose functions are to make things more or less certain. Here a hedging perspective is used to critically examine how managerial leadership is constructed in and by hedged LtS and how entitlements are accomplished by these hedged constructions.

    The empirical material consists of all of the LtS produced by companies traded on the Stockholm Stock Exchange so-called A list in 2003, and it is interpreted through both quantitative and qualitative measures.

  • 42.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Tongivande entreprenörskap: opera på småländska2018 (ed. 1)Book (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Entreprenörskap på kulturens område är ett fenomen präglat av motstridigheter och paradoxer. Ekonomiska realiteter ställs mot konstnärliga och kreativa ambitioner – och kontrasteras mot sociala och ideologiska förväntningar. Vad kännetecknar de organisatoriska processer som gör detta entreprenörskap möjligt, men som samtidigt också begränsar det? Vilka typiska handlingar, erfarenheter och förhållningssätt kan sägas definiera entreprenörskap på kulturens område?

    För att besvara frågor som dessa riktas blicken i den här boken  mot etableringen av företaget Smålandsoperan. Genom en fallstudie av detta ”tongivande entreprenörskap” skapas förståelse för entreprenörskapets typiska organiseringsrepertoar.

  • 43.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    Tongivande tillit på entreprenörskapsfältet: det sociala kapitalets betydelse för entreprenörskap i gränslandet mellan kultur och marknad2018In: Organisation & Samhälle, ISSN 2001-9114, E-ISSN 2002-0287, no 2, p. 78-83Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 44.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship.
    Eriksson, Magnus
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of Film and Literature.
    The Art and Business of "Being Critical"2016In: Art and Business: Building a Common Ground for Understanding Society / [ed] Elena Raviola, Peter Zackariasson, Routledge, 2016, p. 16-27Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Organisation and Entrepreneurship. Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Management Accounting and Logistics.
    Ingman, Sissi
    Malmö University.
    Stavreski, Helena
    Malmö University.
    Governance within government: (re)thinking leadership in the city of Malmö?2016In: Presented at the 6th LAEMOS Conference, Viña del Mar, Chile, April 6-9, 2016, 2016Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 46.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Kallifatides, MarkusStockholm School of Economics.
    Samtalet fortsätter: bortom ledarskapets gränser2005Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 47.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Nilsson, Pernilla
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Bureaucrats and Heretics2007Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Ever since de Gournay in the 18th Century complained about the spirit of laws in France, “an illness… which bids fair to play havoc with us” and diagnosed this illness as bureaumania, the bureaucrat has been a contested character. In the 19th Century described by Balzac as “fussy and meddlesome… as a small shopkeeper’s wife”, and by vom Stein portrayed as nothing but a “lifeless machine”, the bureaucrat in the 21st Century is ridiculed under headings such as “the end of bureaucracy” and “post-bureaucracy”, as the very opposite to consecrated values such as flexibility, creativity, and entrepreneurship, and systematically replaced by all that is “anti-bureaucrat”, in theory, as well as in practice.

    This attitude towards the bureaucrat has, of course, not stood unquestioned. The bureaucratic personality, or better yet ethos, has also been assigned many good qualities and sometimes even elevated as a foundation for democracy. Weber, for instance, approached bureaucracy from this entirely different angle and highlighted the conceptual coherence between bureaucracy and democracy. An idea that occasionally still holds fort, as for instance in du Gay’s writings where it is maintained that democracy needs the bureaucratic ethos in order to provide proper government.

    In this paper these two seemingly incompatible versions of the bureaucrat are taken to form a mythology of good and evil, so ingrained into modernity and our everyday understanding that it is hard to even imagine a world, let alone an organization, without it. It is a mythology that nourishes upon, and upholds, organizational characters larger than life, and it is a mythology that nourishes upon, and upholds, certain dominant ontologies inasmuch as different power elites use the mythology according to their specific wills and interests.

    Given this ideologically inclined present day anti-bureaucrat discourse our ambition here is not to, as some writers have tried to do, praise or resurrect bureaucracy. Our ambition is instead to outline the bureaucratic mythology of good and evil, and to this against the backdrop of a gender perspective. Drawing

    attention to the gendered aspects of the bureaucratic mythology, we would like to raise some neglected issues regarding the way the bureaucratic mythology is enacted, and how these enactments might give rise to different consequences for men and women in their everyday organizational life.

  • 48.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Nilsson, Pernilla
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. LEO.
    Bureaucrats and Heretics – Gendering Mythology2008In: Organizational Epics and Sagas: Tales of Organizations, Palgrave, London , 2008, p. 80-92Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 49.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Nilsson, Pernilla
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Ledarskapets grundvillfarelse2003In: Det oavsedda ledarskapet / [ed] Daniel Ericsson, Lund: Academia adacta, 2003, 1, p. 113-128Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 50.
    Ericsson, Daniel
    et al.
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics. Stockholm School of Economics.
    Nilsson, Pernilla
    Växjö University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Management and Economics.
    Projektilernas vådafärd2003In: Det oavsedda ledarskapet / [ed] Daniel Ericsson, Lund: Academia adacta, 2003, 1, p. 81-91Chapter in book (Other academic)
12 1 - 50 of 55
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf