lnu.sePublications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 18 of 18
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    A New Framework for Political Analysis2010In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), 2-5 September 2010, Washington D.C., 2010Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 2.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Beyond Unity in Plurality: Rethinking the Pluralist Legacy2010In: Contemporary Political Theory, ISSN 1470-8914, E-ISSN 1476-9336, Vol. 9, no 4, p. 458-476Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 3.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Book reviews: Democratic Governance – By Mark Bevir2011In: Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, ISSN 0952-1895, E-ISSN 1468-0491, Vol. 24, no 2, p. 395-398Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Cartelization Versus Representation?: On A Misconception in Contemporary Party Theory2017In: Party Politics, ISSN 1354-0688, E-ISSN 1460-3683, Vol. 23, no 2, p. 124-134Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    According to a popular but controversial view in contemporary party research, political parties increasingly put a premium on governing within the institutions of the state rather than on representation of interests and identities in society. This critique has been phrased most uncompromisingly in Richard Katz and Peter Mair’s theory of the cartel party, according to which the cartel party governs but does not represent, and thus fails to do what we expect of parties in a modern democracy. This article is an analysis and critique of this presupposition, which has largely escaped the attention of commentators. The idea that the cartel party governs but does not represent rests on an untenable view of political representation. As I argue, the normative problem with the cartel party is not so much that this type of party does not represent, as to decide when and how it does or does not represent.

  • 5.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Community?2015In: Global Community?: Transnational and Transdisciplinary Exchanges / [ed] Henrik Enroth & Douglas Brommesson, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2015, p. 165-180Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 6.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    "En ny vetenskap om politik för en ny värld?"2010In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 112, no 4, p. 374-378Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Fear as a Political Factor2017In: International Political Sociology, ISSN 1749-5679, E-ISSN 1749-5687, Vol. 11, no 1, p. 55-72Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In past decades, social and cultural theory as well as international relations theory and political theory have been preoccupied with the subject of fear. In this article, I return the conversation about fear as a political factor to what may be the oldest subject in the book: the connection between fear and political authority. Today, I suggest, we are in the midst of a shift in our understanding of this relationship, prompted not least by efforts to come to terms, analytically and politically, with the challenges of climate change. The article seeks to get a clearer view of this shift by identifying and analyzing three distinct stories in academic and public discourse about fear and political authority. By way of conclusion, I venture that these mutations in our ways of thinking, speaking, and feeling about political authority and fear point toward a model of political authority for post-sovereign conditions.

  • 8.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Governance: The Art of Governing after Governmentality2014In: European Journal of Social Theory, ISSN 1368-4310, E-ISSN 1461-7137, Vol. 17, no 1, p. 60-76Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    As Michel Foucault and others have shown, from the seventeenth through the twentieth centuries, Western political discourse has perpetuated an art of governing aimed at societies and populations. This article argues that this modern art of governing is now coming undone, in the name of governance. The discourse on governance is taking us from an art of governing premised on producing policy for a society or a population to an art of governing premised on solving problems with no necessary reference to any kind of society or population. Tracing the evolution of that discourse, the article argues that existing social and political theory has failed to make sense of this shift. It concludes that in order to access and assess the new art of governing on its own terms we need a sociological imagination that stretches beyond societies and a political imaginary without the presupposition of collectivities.

  • 9.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Policy Network Theory2011In: The SAGE Handbook of Governance / [ed] Mark Bevir, London: Sage Publications, 2011, p. 19-35Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Representation och kartellisering2014In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 116, no 1, p. 149-158Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article discusses the relationship between political representation and cartelization. Proponents of the cartel party theory argue as if cartelization and political representation were opposites: insofar as political parties empirically approximate the cartel party type, they will also, so the argument goes, distance themselves from normatively entrenched ideas and ideals about representation. The article questions and critiques this view. Drawing on Hanna Pitkin’s view of political representation as acting in the interests of the represented in a responsive manner, I discuss the difficulties in teasing out what it means to represent and be represented according to the cartel party theory. The article concludes that the proponents of the cartel party theory have not provided any convincing reasons for assuming that representation and cartelization are necessarily opposites, but also that our entrenched understanding of political representation offers little guidance as to the nature of this relationship.

  • 11.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Republican Liberty Going Global2015In: Sovremennaya Respublikanskaya Teoriya / [ed] Evgeny Roshchin, St. Petersburg: European University Press , 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 12.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Stockholm University, Sweden.
    "Republican Liberty Going Global"2012Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 13.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Robert Dahl2010In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Political Theory / [ed] Mark Bevir, London: Sage Publications, 2010Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 14.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    The Concept of Authority Transnationalised2014In: Transnational Legal Theory, ISSN 2041-4005, Vol. 4, no 3, p. 336-353Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article asks what happens to our understanding of the global and of ourselves as political and legal subjects when the concept of authority travels from a national to a transnational context. The article argues that the concept of authority has been able to travel in this fashion by way of figures of speech and thought drawn from the national context. It is also argued that in order to fully understand this process, we need to remind ourselves of connotations that the concept of authority carried prior to its uptake in the national context. The article concludes that whereas the concept of authority today allows us to think, speak and act as if we are still, in the transnational context, political and legal subjects in the same sense as in the modern nation-state, this usage may gloss over normatively consequential differences between these contexts as to the nature of authority.

  • 15.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Översättning av populärvetenskaplig uppsats: Elinor Ostrom, "Resursutnyttjande, hållbarhet och mänskligt beteende," Tvärsnitt (2) 20092009Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 16.
    Enroth, Henrik
    et al.
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Brommesson, Douglas
    Lund University.
    Editor's Introduction2015In: Global Community?: Transnational and Transdisciplinary Exchanges / [ed] Henrik Enroth & Douglas Brommesson, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 17.
    Enroth, Henrik
    et al.
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Brommesson, DouglasLund University.
    Global Community?: Transnational and Transdiscipiinary Exchanges2015Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This volume explores the range and depth of work currently being done in the humanities and social sciences on the conceptual, normative and empirical aspects of global community.

  • 18.
    Hagevi, Magnus
    et al.
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Enroth, Henrik
    Linnaeus University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences.
    Svenska väljare2011In: Den svenska väljaren / [ed] Magnus Hagevi, Umeå: Boréa Bokförlag, 2011, 1, p. 315-336Chapter in book (Other academic)
1 - 18 of 18
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf