Over the past decades, there has been a rise in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the atmosphere, thereby contributing to global warming and climate change. The building sector is among the top contributors to the world’s GHG emissions. In order to reduce GHG emissions, different strategies are being explored and investigated to provide a sustainable solution. In this thesis, the carbon footprint of a seven-story cross-laminated timber (CLT) building system is assessed and optimized from a life cycle perspective. The overall goal is to identify strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of the CLT building through material substitutions and optimized use of materials.
In this thesis, both life cycle assessment (LCA) and finite element method (FEM) using RFEM is carried out. A cradle-to-cradle life cycle assessment (LCA) of the building is conducted according to the European standard EN 15978. Life cycle inventory datasets from the Ecoinvent database are used for the analysis of the product (A1-3) and construction (A4-5) stages of the building, while environmental product declarations (EPDs) are used for the analysis of end-of-life stage. The service life stage of the building is analysed over a 100-year time horizon, considering the maintenance and replacement (B2 and B4) activities linked to the building. Because the CLT technology is relatively young, a web-based was carried out to gather additional data for the analysis of the building’s service life stage.
The finite element analysis using RFEM is used to ensure the stability of the CLT building system after reducing the CLT panel thicknesses. In, addition, relevant calculations are carried out based on different Eurocodes. In this process, deflection checks are performed for the slabs and buckling checks are carried out for the walls, as well as vibration (fundamental frequency) is made sure to satisfy the limits recommended for CLT structures.
The results show that the life cycle carbon footprint of the complete CLT building system is 489.8 kgCO2-eq/m2. Out of this, the production stage has the highest carbon footprint, accounting for 300 kgCO2-eq/m2. Optimizing the CLT panels' thickness in the floor, walls (interior and exterior), and roof reduced the carbon footprint of the building by 1.1% (from 300 to 296.6 kgCO2-eq/m2). In addition, substituting cellulose fiber for mineral wool insulation reduced the product stage carbon footprint of the insulation in the building by 6.2% (227.5 to 213 kgCO2-eq/m2). On the other hand, due to the density differences between mineral wool and cellulose fiber, a greater mass of cellulose fiber was required to achieve the same thermal insulation performance. Consequently, the transportation carbon footprint increased by 5.8% compared to when using the original mineral wool insulation. Therefore, a net carbon footprint reduction of 16.6 kgCO2-eq/m2 (5.5%) is achieved in the production stage (A1-5) when substituting cellulose fiber for mineral wool insulation.
The analysis shows that including biogenic carbon reduced the total carbon footprint of the structure by 62% (489.8 to 185.4 kgCO2-eq/m2). Furthermore, the configuration of the floor of the structure, consisting of aggregates and CLT contributed significantly to reducing the carbon footprint of the building. The two strategies implemented in this study reduced the product stage carbon footprint by 7.3% (227.5 to 211 kgCO2-eq/m2) and the total life cycle carbon footprint of the building by 2.7 % (489.8 to 476.5 kgCO2-eq/m2).
The result shows that 45% of the respondents indicated that maintenance, replacement, repair, and refurbishment would not be necessary for the studied building, while 25% reported that these actions would be necessary twice within the building’s service life of 100 years. Based on these scenarios, carbon footprint of 21.3 and 72.9 kgCO2-eq/m2 may be attributed to maintenance and replacement of the building, respectively. The analysis shows that the end-of-life stage, including deconstruction and demolition, transport and material processing (C1-3) gives carbon footprint of 70.3 kgCO2-eq/m2.
This thesis results imply that optimized use of materials, using renewable materials (wood), and substituting non-renewable materials with renewable can give reductions in the carbon footprint of the studied CLT building system. In addition, in this study it is observed that conducting structural analysis of the CLT building is essential in order to get accurate results and for further trials of thickness reduction by prioritizing and confirming the stability of the CLT building system.