Maintaining physical function in older adults (≥65 years) is crucial for preserving independence and health. This study explored healthcare professionals’ experiences of using a video-based tool in home-based rehabilitation. Through workshops and interviews with 20 rehabilitation professionals, reflexive thematic analysis revealed that video feedback enhanced patient engagement, enabled movement analysis, and supported the development of a shared language in the rehabilitation process. Identified challenges included ethical concerns, data security, and implementation into clinical practice. The findings highlight the potential of video feedback to strengthen motivation and promote autonomy, offering valuable insights for future use in rehabilitation for older adults.

Background: Maintaining and motivating physical functioning among older adults has substantial health-related benefits, such as reducing the risk of falls and increasing the opportunities for independent living. Supporting preventive actions among older adults also has socioeconomic relevance. Previous studies have shown that digital tools involving video feedback can facilitate reflection and learning by encouraging active engagement.

Objective: This study aimed to explore health care professionals’ experiences of using a video-based tool as part of the rehabilitation to facilitate physical functioning among older adults (aged ≥65 years) living at home.

Methods: An experience-based co-design approach was used, involving 20 health care professionals. Nine iterative workshops were conducted, followed by 9 group interviews held between 2022 and 2023. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: The results from this study captured the experiences of health care professionals using a video-based tool to facilitate physical functioning in older adults living at home. The participants described focusing on supporting patient commitment, creating a shared language to enhance collaboration in the rehabilitation process, and navigating barriers to adopting the video-based tool in practice.

Conclusions: From the perspective of health care professionals, video feedback has the potential to improve movement performance in daily activities and may play a crucial role in providing motivation and promoting sustainable physical functioning among older adults. Clinical recommendations include training health care professionals to introduce video feedback in a patient-centered manner and using it to foster shared communication that promotes professional development and patient engagement. Further research is needed to assess the impact of video feedback on older adults’ health outcomes and to identify strategies for implementation in complex rehabilitation needs.

Aims

Cardiac telerehabilitation addresses common barriers for attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR). Pragmatic real-world studies are however lacking, limiting generalizability of available evidence. We aimed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and patient perceptions of remotely delivered EBCR in a multicentre clinical practice setting after myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results

This study included 232 post-MI patients (63.7 years, 77.5% men) from 23 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Sweden (2020-22). Exercise was delivered twice per week for 3 months through a real-time group-based video meeting connecting a physiotherapist to patients exercising at home. Outcomes were assessed before and after remote EBCR completion and comprised assessment of physical fitness, self-reported physical activity and exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy for exercise, exercise adherence, patient acceptance. Safety monitoring in terms of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) was recorded. A total of 67.2% of the patients attended >= 75% of prescribed exercise sessions. Significant improvements in physical fitness, self-reported exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, and HRQoL were observed. Patients agreed that remote EBCR improved health care access (83%), was easy to use (94%) and found exercise performance and interaction acceptable (95%). Sixteen exercise-related AEs (most commonly dizziness and musculoskeletal symptoms) were registered, all of which were resolved. Two SAEs requiring hospitalization were reported, both unrelated to exercise.

Conclusion

This multicentre study supports remote EBCR post-MI as feasible and safe with a high patient acceptance in a real-world setting. The clinical effectiveness needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial.

Trial registration number

NCT04260958.