Background: When moving to a nursing home, the new resident also meets a new kind of culture, including communal, shared meals. Gaining greater insight into the resident experience of mealtimes in nursing homes is essential to identify the meaning that mealtime situations have and highlight the potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mealtime situations that create wellbeing for residents. The aim of this integrative review was therefore to shed light on mealtime situations in nursing homes from the residents’ perspective. Methods: The literature search was performed using a combination of MeSH keywords and free text terms in ASSIA, CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science. After scrutinizing the articles and quality checks, 13 articles were chosen. The analysis was performed following Whittemore and Knafl’s instructions for integrative reviews. Results: The experiences of the mealtime situations were partly connected to residents’ personhood and partly to the nursing home’s organization of the mealtimes. Three main categories emerged: mealtimes as a source of well-being in nursing home life, mealtimes (re)creating continuity in life and preserving identity, and mealtimes as a balancing act between autonomy and need of support. Residents in nursing homes want the possibility to choose both what to eat, with whom they will eat and where they eat. The mealtimes in nursing homes and how they are constructed have an important role in residents’ feelings of having control over their life situation and can also strengthen residents’ identity and autonomy. Conclusion: Staff needs to be aware of the meaning of mealtimes to promote person-centered care in regard to meals. Further research is needed to explore how different mealtime situations have an impact on nursing home residents’ lives as well as on the care the staff gives. 

In the context of long-term care facilities, mealtime situations have been linked to residents’ health and well-being. The optimisation of mealtime situations is dependent on multiple aspects and is complex. To better understand this complexity, this qualitative study aimed to identify staffs’ beliefs about the values of mealtime situations for residents’ health and well-being and to explore the facilitators of, barriers to, and challenges and actions in accomplishing and upholding these values. The results demonstrated that staffs’ belief consisted of achieving social and relational values, vitality values, self-strengthening values and atmospheric values. During mealtimes, participating staff had to constantly balance these values in relation to mealtime situational preconditions and residents’ individual and communal needs. Experienced facilitators, challenges, barriers and actions could be traced to and explained by identified beliefs, implying that knowledge regarding beliefs about values could be helpful for understanding and managing the complexity inherent in the mealtime situation.

This article examines local politicians' assumptions and perceptions regarding welfare technology for older people and their carers. Carers were discursively constructed as merely part of the older person's social sphere, in stark contrast to the realities of the caring situations facing many carers. Older people who remain in their homes, maintaining a healthy and active lifestyle, were discursively constructed as ideal citizens. We argue that such a prevailing discourse leads to the risk of older people with extensive care needs becoming sidelined. Further, it leaves little room to consider carers' needs and preferences for support.

Purpose: Persons living with brain tumors may experience severe impairment, requiring social support (i.e., informal care). Although informal caregiving can be rewarding, it can also lead to physical or psychological burdens. The aim of this study was to explore how informal caregivers of persons living with brain tumors use resources available to them, including social support, to balance caregiving with other aspects of life. Methods: Sixteen informal caregivers (14 partners, two adult children) of persons living with brain tumors, varied in gender (10 female, six male), age (26-79 years), and caregiving experience (1-20 years) were interviewed. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Findings: We generated nine categories representing informal caregivers' strategies grouped by resources used. Intrapersonal resources were used for: Flexibly adjusting to changing life situations; Separating the care recipient from the illness; and Reflectively renegotiating self-expectations. Interpersonal resources were used for: Coping together with the care recipient; Sharing responsibilities within the family; Seeking guidance from persons in similar situations; and Grouping social relations by function. Healthcare and community resources were used for: Active collaborations with healthcare staff and Accessing professional and community resources for mental well-being. Conclusions: Informal caregivers used their intrapersonal, interpersonal, and healthcare and community resources in various ways for mainly emotional and instrumental support. More informational support from healthcare was desired, indicating that healthcare services, along with patient and caregiver organizations, may be able to enhance such support for informal caregivers. This could, in turn, allow more flexibility to manage caregiving alongside other life commitments.

Swedish national policy emphasizes welfare technology as an integral part of future health and social care provision for older people. This study examines how representatives of the two largest pensioners' organizations in Sweden perceived and adopted stances regarding the implementation and use of welfare technology in health and social care. It also seeks to understand the democratic implications of welfare technology, expressed in terms of participation and agency and impacts on the health of older people and informal carers. Four focus groups were organized to determine how representatives of the two largest pensioners' organizations in Sweden perceive the implementation of welfare technology in the health and social care sectors for their members and articulate related positions. The participants perceived welfare technology with concern, anticipating a harsher society for those lacking support from informal carers, and regarded the opportunity for participation and agency as limited. They expressed commitment to and solidarity with excluded groups, emphasizing the importance of leaving no one behind when care services are delivered via welfare technology. The participants adapted to the prescribed norm within the discourse, correcting their way of speaking and expressing critique rather subtly. Our findings have implications for policy, highlighting the importance of older people's participation and the central role of informal carers in the social welfare system. Carers' contributions were deemed critical in providing not only emotional support and companionship but also in facilitating daily living activities and healthcare management, essential for maintaining the dignity and quality of life of the older person.

The general discourse in health and social care policy purports digital technology as necessary to meet growing demands for long-term care and health care as a result of an ageing population. This needs critical investigation since public policy influences people's health and wellbeing. This study aims to interrogate critically what we call the ‘digital technology solution’ discourse in local Swedish health and social care policies. The main concern of our analysis is the discursive constructions of older people and their informal carers and how the concept of health is constructed. A discourse analysis was conducted of 61 local policy documents using the ‘What's the Problem Represented to Be’ method. Our analysis revealed that so-called ‘e-health strategies’ were rarely concerned with health. Health was often referred to as an activity and seen as a means to achieve independence among older people. The norm advocated independence, with the responsibility placed upon the older person, supported by digital technology. Informal carers were constructed as a resource within an older person's environment and largely taken for granted. We argue that the digital solution discourse ignores older people's agency and capacities as contributors to society, not least with regards to being providers of informal care.

Patient and public involvement is a way of ensuring that research and practices are more responsive to their target groups. This study, inspired by discourse psychology, explores the knowledge contributions of informal carers who participated in group meetings to co-create a support intervention. Findings highlight that carers’ knowledge is complex, including more than practical caring experiences. Acknowledging carers’ knowledge contributions and involving a heterogeneous sample of carers are key considerations for patient and public involvement in research; otherwise, there is a danger of establishing risks of injustice. Accepting the multifaceted knowledge of carers could increase the validity of research and the relevance of interventions developed.

Background: Public involvement in health and social care research is increasingly prioritized by policy-makers and research funders. Often, the impact of the involvement is described in terms of how it has contributed to the research outcomes and how it has affected the involved members of the public. There is a dearth of studies reporting from the perspective of researchers themselves of having involved members of the public in their research. Nevertheless, there is a general expectation for researchers to accept and embrace public involvement in research. This study aims to explore researchers' views of involving informal carers in health and social care research. Methods: Eleven individual in-depth interviews with researchers in the fields of social work, caring science, health science and medical science constituted the dataset of this qualitative study, inspired by discourse psychology. Results: The qualitative data analysis resulted in two interpretative repertoires describing researchers' views of involving informal carers in research, "Philosophy of Science " and "Personal relationships and growth ". Both repertoires need to be recognized; however, as of today, the Philosophy of Science repertoire is more acknowledged, while the second repertoire describing empathy, relationships and emotions may be viewed as the researcher being "unprofessional ". Further, the findings highlighted the dual perspective of being a researcher and a carer as creating opportunities for growth on the part of the researcher, on both a professional and a personal level. Conclusions: Researchers and their research work would benefit from acknowledging, discussing and reporting both interpretative repertoires in their publications, as well as recognizing the benefit of dialectal positions, for example, having a dual perspective as both a researcher and an informal carer.

Mealtimes are important events in care homes for physical and social well-being. However, residents usually have little input concerning meal timings, what food is offered, and how it is served. This integrative review explored mealtime interventions and their outcomes in care homes related to the Five Aspects Meal Model (FAMM). Research articles published 2010–2021 were searched for in ASSIA, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and SveMed+ and resulted in 13 articles focusing on interventions. The analysis was based on the aspects of FAMM: room, meeting, product, management control system, and atmosphere. The result shows that even though interventions specifically focused on one aspect, they often evaluated outcomes related to several aspects. Different aspects can work together to foster effective mealtimes. FAMM eased to visualise the usefulness of mealtime interventions from a broad perspective and can be a useful tool for assessing and improving mealtime situations in clinical practice.

Background and aims There is a growing demand for health and social care services to provide technology‐mediated interventions that promote the health and well‐being of older people with health or care needs and of their informal carers. The objectives of this study were to scope and review the nature and extent of prior intervention studies involving ambient assisted living technology‐mediated interventions for older people and their informal carers, and how and in what ways (if any) the goals and aims of these interventions reflected the domains of the World Health Organization framework for healthy ageing.

Methods We conducted a scoping review. Data were collected between June and October 2018 with an updated search in October 2020. A total of 85 articles were eligible for inclusion.

Results Nine categories described the aims and content of the included studies. The healthy ageing domain “Ability to meet basic needs” was mirrored in four categories, whereas “Ability to contribute to society” was not addressed at all.

Conclusion The ways in which domains of healthy ageing are mirrored suggest that there is an emphasis on individual factors and individual responsibility, and a lack of attention given to broader, environmental factors affecting healthy ageing. Only a few of the studies used a dyadic approach when assessing health outcomes concerning older people and their informal carers.