lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding stress reports in daily life: a coordinated analysis of factors associated with the frequency of reporting stress
Univ Calif Merced, USA.
SUNY Stony Brook, USA.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7060-4964
Penn State Univ, USA.
Penn State Univ, USA.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of behavioral medicine, ISSN 0160-7715, E-ISSN 1573-3521, Vol. 42, nr 3, s. 545-560Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Although stress is a common experience in everyday life, a clear understanding of how often an individual experiences and reports stress is lacking. Notably, there is little information regarding factors that may influence how frequently stress is reported, including which stress dimension is measured (i.e., stressorsdid an event happen, subjective stresshow stressed do you feel, conditional stresshow stressful a stressor was) and the temporal features of that assessment (i.e., time of day, day of study, weekday vs. weekend day). The purpose of the present study was to conduct a coordinated analysis of five independent ecological momentary assessment studies utilizing varied stress reporting dimensions and temporal features. Results indicated that, within days, stress was reported at different frequencies depending on the stress dimension. Stressors were reported on 15-32% of momentary reports made within a day; across days, the frequency ranged from 42 to 76% of days. Depending on the cutoff, subjective stress was reported more frequently ranging about 8-56% of all moments within days, and 40-90% of days. Likewise, conditional stress ranged from just 3% of moments to 22%, and 11-69% of days. For the temporal features, stress was reported more frequently on weekdays (compared to weekend days) and on days earlier in the study (relative to days later in the study); time of day was inconsistently related to stress reports. In sum, stress report frequency depends in part on how stress is assessed. As such, researchers may wish to measure stress in multiple ways and, in the case of subjective and conditional stress with multiple operational definitions, to thoroughly characterize the frequency of stress reporting.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2019. Vol. 42, nr 3, s. 545-560
Emneord [en]
Stress, Stressor, Subjective stress, Ecological momentary assessment, Coordinated analysis
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Samhällsvetenskap, Psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-112777DOI: 10.1007/s10865-018-00008-xISI: 000468272100015PubMedID: 30600403Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85059504848OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-112777DiVA, id: diva2:1656902
Tilgjengelig fra: 2022-05-09 Laget: 2022-05-09 Sist oppdatert: 2022-05-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Person

Marcusson-Clavertz, David

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Scott, Stacey B.Marcusson-Clavertz, David
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of behavioral medicine

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 20 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf