lnu.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of a dual treatment on myopia progression: the Cambridge anti-myopia study
Anglia Ruskin University, UK ; Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.
Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia ; University of Manchester, UK.
Anglia Ruskin University, UK ; Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.
Anglia Ruskin University, UK ; Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2013 (engelsk)Inngår i: Ophthalmic & physiological optics, ISSN 0275-5408, E-ISSN 1475-1313, Vol. 33, nr 3, s. 267-276Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a dual treatment modality for myopia, by improving accommodative functions, on myopia progression.

METHODS: A double blind randomised control trial was conducted on 96 subjects. The treatment modality for the trial employed custom designed contact lenses which control spherical aberration in an attempt to optimise static accommodation responses during near-work, and a vision-training programme to improve accommodation dynamics. Myopia progression was assessed over a 2 year period using cycloplegic autorefraction and biometry.

RESULTS: The mean progression was found to be -0.33 Dioptres (D) over the 2 years of the study. There was no interaction between contact lens treatment and vision training treatment at 24 months (p = 0.72). There was no significant treatment effect of either Vision Training or Contact Lens Spherical Aberration control on myopia progression.

CONCLUSIONS: This study is unable to demonstrate that the progression of myopia can be reduced over a 2 year period by either of the two treatments aimed at improving accommodative function. Neither treatment group (contact lens or vision training) progressed at a slower rate over the 2 years of the study than did the appropriate control group.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Vol. 33, nr 3, s. 267-276
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Naturvetenskap, Optometri
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-44816DOI: 10.1111/opo.12035PubMedID: 23662960OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-44816DiVA, id: diva2:823700
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-06-18 Laget: 2015-06-18 Sist oppdatert: 2025-05-07bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Person

Theagarayan, Baskar

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Theagarayan, Baskar
I samme tidsskrift
Ophthalmic & physiological optics

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 623 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf