This systematic living meta-review investigated the presence of open science practices (e.g., preregistration of protocols), reproducibility (e.g., describing searches and where exactly primary data is collected), and FAIR data adherence (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) in educational systematic reviews through the years 2019-2023. Additionally, we assessed the systematic reviews for adherence to MECCIR standards (Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews; Wang et al., 2021), using the tool ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews; Whiting et al., 2016).

Results show that very few systematic reviews could be assessed as low risk of bias, had preregistered a protocol, were possible to reproduce, and very few organized their data according to FAIR. There were however some reviews that adhered to the (much needed) rigorous standards and shared data that can be reused. This poster will address these issues further and discuss how the community can improve reproducibility practices.