lnu.sePublikationer
Driftstörningar
Det förekommer återkommande driftstörningar på några av sök-portalerna på grund av hög belastning. Vi arbetar på att lösa problemet, ni kan tillfälligt mötas av ett felmeddelande.
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
One Lens Missing? Clarifying the Clinical Microsystem Framework with Learning Theories
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för samhällsvetenskap (FSV), Institutionen för pedagogik (PED). Hälsohögskolan i Jönköping, Jönköping Academy for Health and Welfare. (Bridging the Gaps)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-3164-8462
Linnéuniversitetet, Fakulteten för samhällsvetenskap (FSV), Institutionen för pedagogik (PED).
School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University.
2013 (Engelska)Ingår i: Quality Management in Health Care, ISSN 1063-8628, E-ISSN 1550-5154, Vol. 22, nr 2, s. 126-136Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The clinical microsystem (CMS)approach is widely used and is perceived as helpfulin practice but, we ask the question: “Is its learningpotential sufficiently utilized?” Objectives: Toscrutinize aspects of learning within the CMSframework and to clarify the learning aspects theframework includes and thereby support theframework with the enhanced learning perspectivethat becomes visible. Methods: Literature on theCMS framework was systematically searched andselected using inclusion criteria. An analytical toolwas constructed in the form of a theoretical lensthat was used to clarify learning aspects that areassociated with the framework. Findings: Theanalysis revealed 3 learning aspects: (1) The CMSframework describes individual and social learningbut not how to adapt learning strategies forpurposes of change. (2) The metaphorical languageof how to reach a holistic health care system foreach patient has developed over time but can stillbe improved by naming social interactions totranscend organizational boundaries. (3) Powerstructures are recognized but not as a characteristicthat restricts learning due to asymmetriccommunication. Conclusion: The “lens” perspectivereveals new meanings to learning that enhance ourunderstanding of health care as a social system andprovides new practical learning strategies.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013. Vol. 22, nr 2, s. 126-136
Nyckelord [en]
clinical microsystem, learning theory, quality improvement, workplace learning
Nationell ämneskategori
Didaktik Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Forskningsämne
Pedagogik och Utbildningsvetenskap, Pedagogik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-26906DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31828c22e2ISI: 000209317100006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84879369102OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-26906DiVA, id: diva2:631325
Projekt
Bridging the Gaps
Forskningsfinansiär
VINNOVATillgänglig från: 2013-06-20 Skapad: 2013-06-20 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-06Bibliografiskt granskad
Ingår i avhandling
1. Towards the creation of learning improvement practices: Studies of pedagogical conditions when change is negotiated in contemporary healthcare practices
Öppna denna publikation i ny flik eller fönster >>Towards the creation of learning improvement practices: Studies of pedagogical conditions when change is negotiated in contemporary healthcare practices
2015 (Engelska)Doktorsavhandling, sammanläggning (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Alternativ titel[sv]
Mot lärande förbättringspraktiker : Studier av pedagogiska villkor då förändringar förhandlas i samtida hälso- och sjukvårdspraktiker
Abstract [en]

In the early 2010s, competitive market logic was introduced into healthcare systems so as to achieve rapid improvements. This took place as improvement policies began to emphasize the notion of collaboration as a method of ensuring patient safety across organizational boundaries. This thesis addresses how staff, in their practical improvement work, balance economic values, on the one hand, against meaningful solutions for the patient, on the other. The research interest focuses on the particular interpretations about improvements that emerge in negotiations about change. These interpretations are foundational to the learning that simultaneously takes place. The aim of the thesis is to analyse and explain the pedagogical conditions that take place in improvement practices in a healthcare system in the 2010s.

The thesis takes its theoretical point of departure in a pedagogical theory that describes how contextual conditions influence learning processes in a specific practice where communication is foundational for learning. The thesis uses critical discourse analysis as a methodological point of departure and builds on a model of improvement work, namely, the clinical microsystem. The first study consists of a literature review of the microsystem framework. Subsequently, three case studies were conducted at Jönköping county council, Sweden. Discussions of improvements at clinical meetings and improvement coaches’ reflections over their pedagogical approaches provide the empirical data for the case studies.

The findings show that market logic gives rise to a number of displacement effects with respect to learning processes. Short-term profits are shown to supersede goals of a more profound development of knowledge. The composition of an improvement practice is of critical importance to the nature of the negotiation that takes place, and thus how the practice comes to successfully challenge things that are taken for granted and the power structures that exist within the practice. Improvement coaches themselves become pedagogical prerequisites under the influence of the prevailing conditions, as they promote different learning organizations. This thesis develops the conceptual framework that is instantiated by the clinical microsystem, and it also contributes to the social constructionist field of improvement science by establishing pedagogical and discursive perspectives on improvement and change.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2015. s. 121
Serie
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 221/2015
Nyckelord
quality improvement, clinical microsystem, healthcare policy, critical discourse analysis, governing mechanism, knowledge management, negotiation, förbättringsarbete, hälso- och sjukvårdspolicy, arbetplatsrelaterat lärande, förhandling
Nationell ämneskategori
Pedagogik
Forskningsämne
Samhällsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-42709 (URN)9789187925610 (ISBN)
Disputation
2015-05-13, Myrdal, Hus K, Universitetsplatsen 1, Växjö, 13:15 (Engelska)
Opponent
Handledare
Projekt
Bridging the Gaps
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Forskningsrådet för hälsa, arbetsliv och välfärd, A2007037
Tillgänglig från: 2015-04-22 Skapad: 2015-04-20 Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-09Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Norman, Ann-CharlottFritzén, Lena

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Norman, Ann-CharlottFritzén, Lena
Av organisationen
Institutionen för pedagogik (PED)
I samma tidskrift
Quality Management in Health Care
DidaktikHälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 569 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf