According to the Swedish Education Act, schools should support both students' knowledge development and personal development. Students' levels of knowledge are measured and compared through their examination results and formal grades as well as through international comparative studies and other tools. However, students' personal development is not measured. The purpose of this study is to explore the efforts of local governance chain actors - the Local Educational Authority (LEA), superintendents, principals and teachers - to realise these two normative requirements and to learn more about the tensions and power struggles between these actors. The overarching question is: How do the actors in the governance chain prioritise and act with regard to the requirements for developing students' knowledge and students as individuals? This study is designed as a case study in a compulsory school setting. The empirical data were collected by interviewing LEA chairs, superintendents, principals and teachers in a small town in the south of Sweden. The results show that the LEA and the superintendents focus on students' knowledge development, but principals and teachers resist a too strong focus on knowledge development. The normative requirement - students' personal development - is not explicitly discussed at any level in the governance chain.