lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) with guided self-help CBT as a treatment option: a protocol of a single-blind randomized multicenter trial (KAIROS)
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Psychology.ORCID iD: 0009-0008-2295-2076
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden;Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet, Sweden;Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Psychology. Karolinska Institutet, Sweden;Region Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6443-5279
2025 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 1208Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: While protocol-based psychological treatments have significantly advanced mental health care, real-world accessibility remains a challenge. Primary care, the main provider of mental health services, faces barriers such as limited resources and a diverse patient population with varying needs, making it difficult to rely solely on time-intensive, protocolized treatments. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model promotes brief, flexible interventions that may better accommodate these needs. However, limited research on these interventions raises concerns about potential undertreatment. To align with Universal Health Coverage principles, it is essential to identify which patient groups benefit most from resource-efficient protocol-based versus brief, flexible, and individualized treatments. Our main aim is to evaluate whether a integrating guided self-help into PCBH improves outcomes compared to the core PCBH model, as well as to assess whether patients identified as suitable for protocol-based interventions benefit more from the combined model.

Methods: Patients seeking help for mental or behavioral health problems at PCBH primary care centers will be randomized to one of two arms: core PCBH, where patients receive a contextual assessment and brief interventions tailored to their needs, or an extended PCBH model, where a diagnostic assessment determines whether patients receive brief interventions or guided self-help. The primary outcome is functional impairment, assessed at baseline and followed up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (primary endpoint), as well as at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include symptom change, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors.

Discussion: The study design allows for comparisons of patient outcomes between the two care models, with a primary focus on evaluating superiority and a secondary focus on non-inferiority, cost-effectiveness, and care process factors. Overall, the project seeks to advance understanding of effective mental health interventions in primary care settings and inform decision-making regarding treatment approaches.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 1208
Keywords [en]
primary care behavioral health, pcbh, guided self-help, gsh, cognitive behavioral therapy, cbt, primary care
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-141945DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13232-4ISI: 001578341000003PubMedID: 40988013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105016908824OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-141945DiVA, id: diva2:2005065
Available from: 2025-10-09 Created: 2025-10-09 Last updated: 2025-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1737 kB)30 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1737 kBChecksum SHA-512
999106d9910390de7d4bf360ebc16a77c471aaf07286ef5b48147a2f56a45df822d583ffcb115eb9084cdaf9bb2df597873a79c8b8491ed94b182a717cf596bd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Farnsworth von Cederwald, AnneliKaldo, Viktor

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Farnsworth von Cederwald, AnneliKaldo, Viktor
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf