lnu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deep learning-based segmentation and density estimation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells from In Vivo confocal microscopy images
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of computer science and media technology (CM).
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of computer science and media technology (CM).
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Medicine and Optometry.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2140-4584
Linköping University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 16, no 1, article id 1620Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to compare manual assessment of corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) and dendritic cell (DC) density with an automated assessment method utilizing deep learning segmentation to perform rule-based density estimation. Corneal images were acquired using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) from 100 participants with persistent ocular symptoms after mild COVID-19 (Group 1) and 30 controls without symptoms (Group 2). In total, 1,300 IVCM images were selected and manually annotated for CNFL, and 1,300 for DCs (with dendrites and without dendrites), using FIJI tools. The between-method difference in mean CNFL density was 0.2  (95% CI: [0.09, 0.23]) for Group 1 and −0.2  (95% CI: [−0.34, −0.10]) for Group 2. For Group 1, the mean difference for DCs with dendrites was −1.1  (95% CI: [−1.78, −0.39]), and for DCs without dendrites it was −3.1  (95% CI: [−5.1, −1.0]). For Group 2, the mean difference for DCs with dendrites was −1.0  (95% CI: [−1.79, −0.27]), and for DCs without dendrites it was 0.3  (95% CI: [−1.93, 2.60]). Both manual and automated methods showed significant between-group differences for CNFL (p=0.012 and p=0.034, respectively) and DC densities (p=0.005 and p=0.010). The automated approach performed comparably to manual assessment, supporting its potential for reliable, scalable analysis of CNFL and DC in IVCM images.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2026. Vol. 16, no 1, article id 1620
Keywords [en]
deep learning, confocal microscopy, cornea, nerve fibers, dendritic cells, segmentation, density, Covid-19
National Category
Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-144064DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-34412-6ISI: 001662910900001PubMedID: 41530230Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105027348233OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-144064DiVA, id: diva2:2029144
Funder
Linnaeus UniversityAvailable from: 2026-01-16 Created: 2026-01-16 Last updated: 2026-04-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2209 kB)43 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2209 kBChecksum SHA-512
e9454d979ce1fc3bf5957f5d55c228ea1096f96ffa2f56fd21084962ce28b883ad966dac1a233763db8dc98089f23c84d8c80d94f77242db1c4a389482755442
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Roth, JennyLincke, AlisaMacedo, António FilipeLöwe, Welf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Roth, JennyLincke, AlisaMacedo, António FilipeLöwe, Welf
By organisation
Department of computer science and media technology (CM)Department of Medicine and OptometryAdvanced Materials
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 3044 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf