lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Opposite latitudinal patterns for bird and arthropod predation revealed in experiments with differently colored artificial prey
Univ Turku, Finland.
Univ Bordeaux, France.
Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. (Lnuc EEMiS)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9598-7618
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Ecology and Evolution, E-ISSN 2045-7758, Vol. 9, no 24, p. 14273-14285Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The strength of biotic interactions is generally thought to increase toward the equator, but support for this hypothesis is contradictory. We explored whether predator attacks on artificial prey of eight different colors vary among climates and whether this variation affects the detection of latitudinal patterns in predation. Bird attack rates negatively correlated with model luminance in cold and temperate environments, but not in tropical environments. Bird predation on black and on white (extremes in luminance) models demonstrated different latitudinal patterns, presumably due to differences in prey conspicuousness between habitats with different light regimes. When attacks on models of all colors were combined, arthropod predation decreased, whereas bird predation increased with increasing latitude. We conclude that selection for prey coloration may vary geographically and according to predator identity, and that the importance of different predators may show contrasting patterns, thus weakening the overall latitudinal trend in top-down control of herbivorous insects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Vol. 9, no 24, p. 14273-14285
Keywords [en]
arthropod predators, artificial prey, avian predators, biotic interactions, color preference, latitudinal pattern, plasticine models, predation rate
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Natural Science, Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-90544DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5862ISI: 000499265800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85075749818OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-90544DiVA, id: diva2:1378639
Available from: 2019-12-13 Created: 2019-12-13 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Forsman, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsman, AndersSalinas, Norma
By organisation
Department of Biology and Environmental Science
In the same journal
Ecology and Evolution
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 72 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf