lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mapping variability in allocation of Long-Term Care funds across payer agencies in OECD countries
Smokler Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Israel;Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Israel;Tech Univ Berlin, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6358-5059
Austrian Publ Hlth Inst, Austria.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1408-321X
Tech Univ Berlin, Germany.
Inst Rech & Documentat Econ Sante IRDES, France;Lab Econ Dauphine LEDa, France.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Health Policy, ISSN 0168-8510, E-ISSN 1872-6054, Vol. 124, no 5, p. 491-500Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Long-term care (LTC) is organized in a fragmented manner. Payer agencies (PA) receive LTC funds from the agency collecting funds, and commission services. Yet, distributional equity (DE) across PAs, a precondition to geographical equity of access to LTC, has received limited attention. We conceptualize that LTC systems promote DE when they are designed to set eligibility criteria nationally (vs. locally); and to distribute funds among PAs based on needs-formula (vs. past-budgets or government decisions). Objectives: This cross-country study highlights to what extent different LTC systems are designed to promote DE across PAs, and the parameters used in allocation formulae. Methods: Qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire filled by experts from 17 OECD countries. Results: 11 out of 25 LTC systems analyzed, fully meet DE as we defined. 5 systems which give high autonomy to PAs have designs with low levels of DE; while nine systems partially promote DE. Allocation formulae vary in their complexity as some systems use simple demographic parameters while others apply socio-economic status, disability, and LTC cost variations. Discussion and conclusions: A minority of LTC systems fully meet DE, which is only one of the criteria in allocation of LTC resources. Some systems prefer local priority-setting and governance over DE. Countries that value DE should harmonize the eligibility criteria at the national level and allocate funds according to needs across regions. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 124, no 5, p. 491-500
Keywords [en]
Long-term care, Equity, Funds allocation, Payer agencies, Allocation formula
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-102472DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.013ISI: 000532671800001PubMedID: 32197994OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-102472DiVA, id: diva2:1547962
Available from: 2021-04-28 Created: 2021-04-28 Last updated: 2021-04-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Barbabella, Francesco

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Waitzberg, RuthSchmidt, Andrea E.Barbabella, FrancescoAugusto, Goncalo FigueiredoTambor, MarzenaAllin, Sara
In the same journal
Health Policy
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 66 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf