lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Covering surgical instruments with single- or double-layer drape pending surgery: an experimental study in a perioperative setting
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5173-9484
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2602-0101
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2204-2776
2021 (English)In: Journal of Infection Prevention, ISSN 1757-1774, Vol. 22, no 3, p. 126-131Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Abstract [en]

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) constitute a severe threat to surgery patients. The surgical environment must be as free of contaminating microorganisms as possible. Using sterile surgical instruments while performing surgery is an absolute necessity for ensuring quality of care in perioperative settings.

Aim: To compare bacterial contamination of agar plates after 15 h on set surgical instrument tables covered with a single- or double-layer drape.

Methods: An experimental design was used consisting of set instrument tables with six agar plates on each table: four instrument tables were covered with a single-layer drape and four instrument tables were covered with a double-layer drape. This set-up was repeated on nine occasions during the period of data collection, making 76 set instrument tables in total. As a control, one instrument table was uncovered on four of those occasions.

Results: The double-layer drape cover showed a significantly (P = 0.03) lower number of colony forming units (CFU) per agar plate than the single-layer drape covering. As expected, the uncovered instrument tables were highly contaminated.

Discussion: Our results indicate that it is good practice to cover instruments properly with at least a single-layer drape before a surgical procedure. If there is difficulty achieving optimal conditions while setting the instrument tables (e.g. positioning the patient for general anaesthesia), it is a better option to set the instrument tables earlier and cover them with a double-layer drape. These precautions will help protect the patient from harm and unnecessary SSI by lowering microbiological burden, a key factor in developing SSI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2021. Vol. 22, no 3, p. 126-131
Keywords [en]
colony forming unit, perioperative care, surgical instrument, surgical site infection
National Category
Surgery
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-103020DOI: 10.1177/1757177420973753ISI: 000775468300004PubMedID: 34234845Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097307093Local ID: 2020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-103020DiVA, id: diva2:1552551
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05 Last updated: 2022-04-19Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Safeguarding from surgical site infections: A mutual responsibility between the patient, caregiver and the perioperative healthcare leaders
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Safeguarding from surgical site infections: A mutual responsibility between the patient, caregiver and the perioperative healthcare leaders
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aim: The overall aim of this thesis is to describe and explore preventive measuresand risks for surgical site infections.

Methods: Study I, a registry based and observational design study, includes 35 056cases analysed for risks for reoperation caused by periprosthetic joint infection afterelective total hip arthroplasty. Data are analysed with Cox regression. Study II is ahypothesis testing study and uses an experimental design. Comparative statisticswere used to compare contamination of agar plates after 15 hours for twoconditions: single drape covering or double drape covering. Study III, an interviewstudy that uses a reflective lifeworld research methodology, includes 15 operatingroom nurses who were interviewed regarding the phenomenon of intraoperativeprevention of surgical site infections. Study IV, also an interview study, includes 14orthopaedic patients who were interviewed regarding their experience with at-homepreoperative skin disinfection. Data were analysed using manifest content analysisaccording to Graneheim and Lundman.

Results: Study I shows an increased risk of reoperation caused by periprostheticjoint infection after planned total hip arthroplasty for age, male sex, morbidity (ASAclass III-IV), obesity, lateral approach to the hip, general anaesthesia, and prolongedoperative time. Study II shows reduced contamination of agar plates after 15 hoursstorage with double drape covering compared to single drape covering. Study IIIshows that prevention of surgical site infections is a struggle against an invisible anddelayed threat. Another key finding is the importance of operating room nurseslegitimacy and collaboration within the operating team to prevent surgical siteinfections. Study IV describes the patients’ experiences with at-home preoperativeskin disinfection. The result points out obstacles with the procedure and theimportance of identifying those patients who are not suitable for self-care regardingthis preventive measure

Conclusion: Safeguarding from surgical site infections is a mutual responsibility ofthe patient, caregivers, and perioperative healthcare leaders. Therefore, this complexphenomenon is difficult to assess. Prevention of surgical site infections needs to bea collaborative effort involving patient, caregivers, and perioperative healthcareleaders. The high-risk care of performing surgery requires confident and safeprofessionals in each position. Well-functioning teamwork and collaboration arekey factors for ensuring stability inside the operating room and providing conditionsfor safe care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2021. p. 84
Series
Linnaeus University Dissertations ; 427
Keywords
Operating Room, Perioperative care, Prevention, Qualitative content analysis, Reflective lifeworld research, Surgical site infection, Operating room nurse, Teamwork
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Health and Caring Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-108180 (URN)9789189460256 (ISBN)9789189460263 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-12-10, N 1007 Ikea-salen, växjö, 15:57 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-01-12 Created: 2021-11-22 Last updated: 2025-03-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Qvistgaard, MariaAlmerud Österberg, SofiaLovebo, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Qvistgaard, MariaAlmerud Österberg, SofiaLovebo, Jenny
By organisation
Department of Health and Caring Sciences
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 430 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf