lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implications of different modelling choices in primary energy and carbon emission analysis of buildings
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Built Environment and Energy Technology. (SBER)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7944-6739
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Built Environment and Energy Technology.
2021 (English)In: Energy and Buildings, ISSN 0378-7788, E-ISSN 1872-6178, Vol. 247, article id 111145Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Sustainable development
SDG 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable, SDG 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns, SDG 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all, SDG 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts by regulating emissions and promoting developments in renewable energy
Abstract [en]

In recent years, several comparative life cycle analyses have shown that increasing the use of wood in buildings can reduce the life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of buildings. This study reviews the life cycle inventory methodology of primary energy use and carbon emissions, based on ecoinvent database, considering different modelling choices for (i) materials heating values; (ii) biogenic carbon; (iii) calcination and carbonation processes; (iv) electricity production scenarios; (v) impact distribution of multi-functional processes; (vi) post-use benefits. The analysis relates to the standards while the implication of different modelling choice is shown by comparing the primary energy use and carbon emission in the production and end-of-life stages of a multi-storey residential building with concrete, cross laminated timber and modular timber structures, respectively. The results highlight the displacement between different modelling choices in terms of primary energy use and carbon emissions. Such modelling options especially influence the LCA results in the product stage and beyond the end of life stage, and especially wood- and/or cement-based materials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 247, article id 111145
Keywords [en]
Life cycle analysis, primary energy, carbon emissions, modelling options, wood materials, energy scenarios, biogenic carbon, multi-functional processes
National Category
Building Technologies Other Environmental Engineering
Research subject
Technology (byts ev till Engineering), Civil engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-103774DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111145ISI: 000679099200012Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85108711514Local ID: 2021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-103774DiVA, id: diva2:1558493
Available from: 2021-05-31 Created: 2021-05-31 Last updated: 2021-09-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Piccardo, ChiaraGustavsson, Leif

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Piccardo, ChiaraGustavsson, Leif
By organisation
Department of Built Environment and Energy Technology
In the same journal
Energy and Buildings
Building TechnologiesOther Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 137 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf