lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How well do genetic markers inform about responses to intraspecific admixture?: A comparative analysis of microsatellites and RADseq
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. (Lnuc EEMiS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0431-8417
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. Linnaeus University, Linnaeus Knowledge Environments, Water. (Lnuc EEMiS)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9598-7618
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Biology and Environmental Science. (Lnuc EEMiS)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3145-1475
2021 (English)In: BMC Genomic Data, E-ISSN 2730-6844, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 22Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Fitness consequences of intraspecific genetic admixture can vary from positive to negative depending on the genetic composition of the populations and environmental conditions. Because admixture has potential to influence the success of management and conservation efforts, genetic similarity has been suggested to be used as a proxy to predict the outcome. Studies utilizing microsatellites (a neutral marker) to investigate associations between genetic distance and admixture effects show conflicting results. Marker types that yield information on genome-wide and/or adaptive variation might be more useful for predicting responses to inter-population hybridization. In this study we utilized published data for three populations of pike (Esox lucius) to investigate associations between offspring performance (hatching success) and parental genetic similarity in experimentally purebred and admixed families, based on neutral (microsatellites), genome-wide neutral (RADseq SNPs), and adaptive (SNPs under selection) markers. Results Estimated similarity varied among the markers, likely reflecting differences in their inherent properties, but was consistently higher in purebred than admixed families. A significant interaction between marker type and admixture treatment reflected that neutral SNPs yielded higher estimates than adaptive SNPs for admixed families whereas no difference was found for purebred families, which indicates that neutral similarity was not reflective of adaptive similarity. When all samples were pooled, no association between similarity and performance was found for any marker. For microsatellites, similarity was positively correlated with hatching success in purebred families, whereas no association was found in admixed families; however, the direction of the effect differed between the population combinations. Conclusions The results strengthen the notion that, as of today, there is no proxy that can reliably predicted the outcome of admixture. This emphasizes the need of further studies to advance knowledge that can shed light on how to safeguard against negative consequences of admixture, and thereby inform management and promote conservation of biological diversity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2021. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 22
Keywords [en]
Esox lucius, Hybridization, Interbreeding, Microsatellites, Offspring performance, Outbreeding, Pike, RADseq, SNP
National Category
Evolutionary Biology Ecology
Research subject
Ecology, Evolutionary Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-105991DOI: 10.1186/s12863-021-00974-3ISI: 000669493400001PubMedID: 34182923Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85108980066Local ID: 2021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-105991DiVA, id: diva2:1581602
Available from: 2021-07-22 Created: 2021-07-22 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Yildirim, YeserinForsman, AndersSunde, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yildirim, YeserinForsman, AndersSunde, Johanna
By organisation
Department of Biology and Environmental ScienceWater
Evolutionary BiologyEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 124 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf