Earlier studies have established that the (perceived) similarity of users is highly subjective and reflects more on how people respect/admire others rather than their characteristics or behavioral similarities. We study this phenomenon among Twitter users, and while confirm that it is indeed the case, we further explore the components of similarity by investigating it using data from three categories (interactions between egos and alters, profile-based activity history, and linguistic content in the messages). We use interactions as estimation for admiration and observe that it has more impact and a higher correlation to the perceived similarity than other objective measures, including similarity based on user profiles and their use of hashtags.