lnu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk of False Positives during Sampling for Heterobasidion annosum s.l.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1741-443X
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
2016 (English)In: Plant Disease, ISSN 0191-2917, E-ISSN 1943-7692, Vol. 100, no 1, p. 175-179Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A standard method to detect infection by Heterobasidion annosum sensu lato (s.l.) in stumps or stems is to cut a disc and examine it under a microscope. Concerns have been raised that spores can be transferred from the bark to the cut surface, thus contaminating the sample. The aims of this study were to test whether viable basidiospores of H. annosum s.l. can be transferred from the bark onto disc surfaces by a chainsaw and to investigate the impacts of different sampling procedures on the extent of contaminations. Logs were cut with or without adding basidiospores to the bark prior to the cut. Infection measurements were significantly greater for discs with treated bark (100% infected, infection coverage 40 cm2 dm-2 of disc area) compared with control discs (47% infected, infection coverage 0.2 to 0.3 cm2 dm-2). In addition, trees were sampled under authentic field conditions using different procedures. The infection measurements differed significantly depending on the procedure; sampling involving debarking or disinfection of the bark with 70% ethanol prior to cutting had lower measurements (6 to 19% and 13% infected, respectively) compared with leaving the bark on untreated (63 to 75% infected). Consideration of the contamination risk is warranted when evaluating the results of earlier studies and when planning new experiments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (APS) , 2016. Vol. 100, no 1, p. 175-179
National Category
Forest Science
Research subject
Technology (byts ev till Engineering), Forestry and Wood Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-108769DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0269-REPubMedID: 30688580OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-108769DiVA, id: diva2:1625172
Available from: 2022-01-06 Created: 2022-01-06 Last updated: 2022-02-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Witzell, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Witzell, Johanna
In the same journal
Plant Disease
Forest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf