lnu.sePublications
EnglishSvenskaNorsk
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Orientalism Debate and the Chinese Wall.
Lund University.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4758-191X
1997 (English)In: Itinerario, ISSN 0165-1153, Vol. 21, no 3, p. 19-40Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A discussion about the relevance of the Orientalism thesis of Edward Said for the field of sinology, i.e., the study of Chinese civilization.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Leiden: Leiden Institute for History , 1997. Vol. 21, no 3, p. 19-40
Keywords [en]
Edward Said, orientalism, China, sinology
National Category
History
Research subject
Humanities, History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-8801OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-8801DiVA, id: diva2:354969
Available from: 2010-10-05 Created: 2010-10-05 Last updated: 2017-02-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Hägerdal, Hans

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hägerdal, Hans
History

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 405 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.47.0
|
WCAG
|
DiVA support
|
Linnaeus University Library
|
Linnaeus University Press
|
Publish/Register