Homes for students can be built with different methods. One method is to mount prefabricated concrete elements on location another method is to cast walls and beam floors with concrete on location. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Two house owner companies in Växjö have built new apartments for students during 2002 and 2003. One company has built with prefabricated concrete elements and the other company has built on location. There are advantages and disadvantages in using any working method and this study illuminates the advantages and disadvantages respectively for each working method within economy, quality, working-environment, production problems, environment and time. This study shows that building a house with a frame of prefabricated concrete elements generates lots of advantages such as economic advantages, better working-environment, less garbage and shorter construction time. These advantages tell us that prefabrication in the building industry will increase in the future. Earlier studies have also made this conclusion. Increasing the prefabrication leads to shorter construction time, which decreases the building costs. More prefabricated buildingparts leads to less garbage and because of this less environmental pollution. It also means, in this case, that the working-environment for the construction workers has become better, because the costructionsight has been protected from the weather after mounting the frame. No conclusions can be drawn about quality or production problems because there are no specific advantages or disadvantages depending on construction-method.